- 17,566
- 23,501
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
Official Green Bay Packers @ Seattle Seahawks Screw Job
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by fraij da 5 11,
- Start date
- 9,937
- 75
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
This dude was all the Sleep and you can see it in his faceDamn this even drama even brought John Clayton out of his room.
- 98
- 12
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2002
I'd be interested in hearing what the black ref has to say. (although I know that won't happen). He signaled for a touchback, but put up zero resistance when the other ref came over and put up the td signal.
- 5,814
- 1,937
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2001
Ha, Seattle completed like 6 passes the entire game until the last two drives. They scored only 1 TD.....the Packers were in this game the entire time. You sound foolish.
I'm not a fan of either team, I just wanted to watch a decent game and it was a dull game until the end.
These games look scenes from the Longest Yard with Adam Sandler. Prison ball, with fights and skirmishes after every damn play. Who the hell talks s*** on kickoff touchbacks?
Can't wait for MLB postseason.
Clyde Frog
formerly jay02
- 12,617
- 7,475
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2011
I know with these refs it goes both ways an all but in the two most important drives of the game
- Roughing the Passer on Walden erases a Packer interception
- Pass interference on Sam Shields when Rice was the one with 2 hands around him.
- No call pass interference on Golden Tate
- Jennings interception given to Tate for the Touchdown
in the most crucial part of the game this all happened. Two interceptions were taken away from us and a TD was gifted to win the game.
none of this even matters if Sam shields doesnt get pushed off. There is no catch/int with shields being there.
I dont think I can even me mad at all this Im actually amused.
- Roughing the Passer on Walden erases a Packer interception
- Pass interference on Sam Shields when Rice was the one with 2 hands around him.
- No call pass interference on Golden Tate
- Jennings interception given to Tate for the Touchdown
in the most crucial part of the game this all happened. Two interceptions were taken away from us and a TD was gifted to win the game.
none of this even matters if Sam shields doesnt get pushed off. There is no catch/int with shields being there.
I dont think I can even me mad at all this
Im actually amused.
- 27,981
- 9,064
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
No one cares because it was the most blatant gifting of a win to an undeserving team that I have ever seen in my lifetime of watching sports. Not just football. Sports.
So if you think that people should care more about a Seattle Seahawks week 3 win than what I just described above, I think it is YOU who is missing the big picture here.
- 8,259
- 573
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
I know with these refs it goes both ways an all but in the two most important drives of the game
- Roughing the Passer on Walden erases a Packer interception
- Pass interference on Sam Shields when Rice was the one with 2 hands around him.
- No call pass interference on Golden Tate
- Jennings interception given to Tate for the Touchdown
in the most crucial part of the game this all happened. Two interceptions were taken away from us and a TD was gifted to win the game.
none of this even matters if Sam shields doesnt get pushed off. There is no catch/int with shields being there.
I dont think I can even me mad at all this
How about the PI called on Kam Chancellor on the go ahead TD drive? They don't call that it's a completely different game.
- 10,799
- 3,525
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2005
Last edited:
ohmygosher
Banned
- 8,072
- 2,447
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
Packer fans should be thankful the real refs weren't out there. At least now you guys have an excuse as to why you guys lost.
- 1,036
- 1,504
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2012
I know with these refs it goes both ways an all but in the two most important drives of the game
- Roughing the Passer on Walden erases a Packer interception
- Pass interference on Sam Shields when Rice was the one with 2 hands around him.
- No call pass interference on Golden Tate
- Jennings interception given to Tate for the Touchdown
in the most crucial part of the game this all happened. Two interceptions were taken away from us and a TD was gifted to win the game.
none of this even matters if Sam shields doesnt get pushed off. There is no catch/int with shields being there.
I dont think I can even me mad at all this
so your gonna point out all the calls that went against you but not point out the calls you benefited from
- 22,244
- 11,002
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2003
Shiiieessst
I thought that sack record was coming down. I was watching for that.
Clyde Frog
formerly jay02
- 12,617
- 7,475
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2011
Youre right, as i said it does go both ways. The whole game you can argue holding calls PI calls and all that. But when it comes down to the last 4 minutes of the game it couldnt have been more lopsided. 2 Ints lost and a Touchdown given in the last 4 minutes of the game.
- 22,244
- 11,002
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2003
I take it you missed the 2006 NBA Finals?
ohmygosher
Banned
- 8,072
- 2,447
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- 8,259
- 573
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
Undeserving huh? You sound like someone who just tuned into ESPN and basing their opinion off just that call. Out of here with that ********. Seahawks played their ******g ***** off. They outplayed the Packers for a good amount of the game and were in a spot to win the game when the refs made a horrible call on them (PI as mentioned a million times) that made a HUGE difference on the outcome. Say the call was bad, but don't call them the most undeserving team you've ever seen in your lifetime that's just a ******g ridiculous statement.
- 8,259
- 573
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
Can't wait for the Seahawks 49ers game the rivalry is real.
- 23,627
- 15,048
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2005
The OPI should have negated the so-called stalemate catch. Green Bay should have won. Seattle looks pretty stout on defense though.
- 17,566
- 23,501
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
As bad as the ending was, it's not a good look for the Packers' o-line to be blaming someone else for this loss.
- 10,799
- 3,525
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2005
- 3,846
- 1,896
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
Clay Matthews is HEATED. If it's real....
.
Last edited:
- 281
- 43
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
i think you should notice how that call wouldnt have defined the outcome indefinitely. it couldve still been 50-50 from that point on....these calls single handedly shaped the win out for the home team which any monkey with a basic functioning brain could point out to which side was wrong if he was taught well...and he'd get paid in bananas. i lost 200 bettin on the GB and im no GB fan, the spread was -3 and considered a 80% cover rate...the refs really must be apart of some scheme in the vegas books because this was blatantly obvious.
ohmygosher
Banned
- 8,072
- 2,447
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
^^ I'm sorry, I meant OPI. Posting from tapatalk.
- 1,679
- 43
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2011
^ point Hybrid
Last edited:
- 16,681
- 27,831
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2005
The one ref called touchback, the other one looked at him like "Dude put ur hands down, I picked SEA...got a mortgage 2 pay"
- 1,225
- 341
- Joined
- May 25, 2012
I respect the hell out of the Seahawks ( minus Pete Caroll), but the Pack dominated your offense as bad as your D dominated the Pack. Your D got moved up and down the field for a number of long drives in the second half. After Benson got going, Hawks D wasnt the same. Pack D caused more 3 and outs than the Hawks D. To say the Pack were only in the game cause of 1 bogus PI call is ridiculous. The Hawks got more yardage penalties calls than the Pack did. Hawks first TD ( and only) was set up after a bad call when it was 1st or 2nd and 20 something. Seahawks D is Nasty ,especially that secondary but the Pack won this game. In no world is that a Catch by Tate.
