- 11,974
- 3,257
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
I think the translations are why it's hard or close to impossible to Google. The words he's using are made up of symbols I think and he's posting the pronunciations.
Do you know what it means?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I think the translations are why it's hard or close to impossible to Google. The words he's using are made up of symbols I think and he's posting the pronunciations.
Do you know what it means?
No, I've never studied Afro-Asiatic languages.
Dismissing what people think about you is a great way of showing that you're here to discuss seriously!Great to see the diversity of thought!
Dismissing what people think about you is a great way of showing that you're here to discuss seriously!
so in between the time you posted the pic and now, you proposed (and she said yes?) congrats!I was actually laughing about it with my girl (now fiance) when I posted it.
so in between the time you posted the pic and now, you proposed (and she said yes?) congrats!
btw i don’t believe you have a fiancé so post a pic so we can believe you.
so in between the time you posted the pic and now, you proposed (and she said yes?) congrats!
btw i don’t believe you have a fiancé so post a pic so we can believe you.
The irony of this post is not lost on me.Dismissing it is taking great care to respond to what the poster said? I guess...
Is there any political issue you want to discuss?
The lies starting to pile up. I want to see the bar cards
I don’t want to unmute
A tough decision indeed. Wonder what you'll choose.
what pic
Lol thanks man. I proposed in February. Still getting used to saying fiance. The ring is in the jewelry thread if you want to see it. Not because I need to prove anything, but it is an exciting time.
“It does not matter when the defendant may have first formulated the opinions expressed, or when he first put them into words: he may no longer share his views on these particular subjects with the world,” Jackson said.
She also said she was left with a sense that the court filing talking about a soon-to-be released book may have been a public relations move.
In the filing, Stone’s lawyers wrote that they were flagging the upcoming book out of an “abundance of caution” given the gag order. But Jackson wrote Tuesday that since the book already was out before the filing was made, it “gives rise to the impression” that the March 1 motion “was intended to serve as a means to generate additional publicity for the book.”
Jackson ordered Stone’s defense to explain by next Monday how he will come in to compliance. She did not state a demand that he pull the book from shelves nationwide.
However, the judge wrote that Stone’s attorneys may have waived any right to complain about his free speech rights because they proposed themselves that the gag order on their client bar “improper” speech by Stone impugning the integrity of the court, Mueller or his prosecution.
Stone, 66, is accused of lying to Congress and obstructing justice to cover up his efforts to gather information concerning hacked Democratic Party emails during the 2016 presidential campaign. He has pleaded not guilty.
Congratulations. All jokes aside. Marriage is hard work but fun.
thats funnyWasn't expecting to see Ninja on the Breakfast Club