- Feb 12, 2008
- 546
- 10
Which is actually worse in the long run?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Chemical test refusal, drivers over age 21: minimum one-year revocation (18 months for a commercial driver).
http://www.nydmv.state.ny...ter02-manual.htm#sus-rev
If you're in nyc i would highly recommend that you take it.
Originally Posted by Je Ne Sais Quoi
I'd rather have my license suspended for refusing a breathalyzer, than face jail time failing it.
That cop is going to have to prove to the court that I was drunk by other, more unreliable ways.![]()
it depends on your state...and women shouldnt be driving anywayOriginally Posted by starzinoureyes
Originally Posted by Je Ne Sais Quoi
I'd rather have my license suspended for refusing a breathalyzer, than face jail time failing it.
That cop is going to have to prove to the court that I was drunk by other, more unreliable ways.![]()
all comes down to this.
if you take that breathalyzer, then there will be documented proof that you were drunk.
but i heard if you refuse the breathalyzer, they have the right to take you down to the station & perform bloodwork. anyone know if this is true??
As opposed to getting a DUI conviction? Refuse the breath test, wait until they take you in for processing, and hopefully you can pass the blood test. I had a friend who refused both.Originally Posted by airkeung88
take it....refuse=jail time.
Originally Posted by eight2one
hmm, ill refuse...but i dont Drink and drive anymore(unless i have to)....i figure my luck was bound to run out and i was taking way too many stupid risk.