- 9,622
- 783
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
I think Jones returns for another year. I think he needs it too to be honest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
I think I been Ryan Broyles biggest fan since his RS-Frosh year but even pre-injury could you justify taking a 5'10 WR who Isnt a burner before the 2nd round?
I'll give it a shot.Originally Posted by Bigmike23
so do people still want to defend the pats draft strategy?
The Pats strategy is a good strategy if you are a team like the Browns, where you need to rebuild and get as much talent in as many positions as possible.Originally Posted by CP1708
I'll give it a shot.Originally Posted by Bigmike23
so do people still want to defend the pats draft strategy?
They have not developed some of thier young guys, but their trading around stuff is still in the best interest. They merely need to hit on a pick or two.
They have made 109 picks since 2000. That's insane numbers when you look at it. 11 years, 7 rounds, should be around 77-80 picks, they are at 109. They get extra players every year that others simply do not, for instance what Oakland is about to go thru, or my own Dolphins. We NEVER make good moves like that adding extra picks.
Hell, for all the crap being thrown at them right now for their defense, they have FOUR picks in the top 64 next year, they SHOULD draft 4 defensive players, or they could move up and maybe take 2 upper tier studs, either way, they are in position to do something. Look at Miami, we have a ton of holes, do we have the chance, even the slight opputunity to move up and take TWO studs, or sit still and take 4 decent players to fill holes? Nope. We get one elite top 3-4 player, and a player we hope we don't screw up in round 2. I pray like hell we can move down every year, and it rarely happens. NE does it every single year, without fail. Maybe this is the year Bill says @#$% it and goes all in for 2 studs. I don't know, but he has that option. 28-29 other teams do not.
I think honestly their mistake this year was taking so much offense in the 2011 draft. OT was an investment to protect Brady, then they took 2 RB's, and waste pick with Mallet (in terms of this team, this run) and then yet another OT and TE (The hell?) in round 5. That's their mistake. Taking only 1 CB in round 2 was unwise. If they invest their third rounders and the 4th rounder on D, they might be in better shape right now.
Again tho, those are OPTIONS that they have, that almost no other team in the league does. So they may not be top shelf drafting wise like they were, or Jimmy's boys, or even the packers of today, but they still have chances and have stayed up top for a full decade, largely due to drafting, they have just made a few mistakes lately, and it's catching up. 4 of the top 64, they still have a chance to have a solid 2012 draft, I just hope they keep trading down 9 times so I can catch up in Miami a bit.
Originally Posted by gangsta207therevolution
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
I think I been Ryan Broyles biggest fan since his RS-Frosh year but even pre-injury could you justify taking a 5'10 WR who Isnt a burner before the 2nd round?
No. But im sad for him.
Originally Posted by Statis22
I think Jones returns for another year. I think he needs it too to be honest.
Originally Posted by DoItAllPaul
Originally Posted by gangsta207therevolution
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
I think I been Ryan Broyles biggest fan since his RS-Frosh year but even pre-injury could you justify taking a 5'10 WR who Isnt a burner before the 2nd round?
No. But im sad for him.
Broyles stock will not drop.He isn't going to grow 4 inches or gain 20 lbs for the combine. You know what you are getting with him. A GREAT 3rd WR who does not drop passes (had 1 drop in 400 throws his way), gets open in space, returns punts, and runs great routes. He isn't a speed burner before his injury and will not be a speed burner after. I see him middle second to early 3rd. He is a team player and I think he will be very reliable in the NFL.
Good I hope everyone agrees with y'all, I want him to come back next yearOriginally Posted by CP1708
Right now he's not even on our radar.Still early in the process when you think about it, and I think only 2-3 Va Tech games have been done, including one by me and it was the QB and Lamar show in that game. I did notice him in the game though and this is what I wrote
David Wilson RB
- Downhill runner, tough to bring down.
- Good but not great speed
- Always falls forward on runs, finishes the play, gets every inch he can
- Mentioned during the broadcast questions about fumbles. Didnât see anything in this game however.
- Could be a mid round guy, but I donât see him being a #1 back in the NFL.
That was 6 weeks ago or so, I'd need to see more of him before I could actually give a knowledgable view on him. And my boss don't seem worried about him either, he just put up his own rankings last week and no mention of the kid yet. Maybe he's overlooked since he's a JR?
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
David Wilson is a Beast.
He def a 4.4 guy.
He reminds me of Deangelo Williams.
the only DE i could see us going after early is coples.. just because of his size and ability to play the run and pass (and also him having spent some time at DT for UNC)Originally Posted by CP1708
I honestly haven't seen enough of the DT's you mentioned. And Coples kicked Miami's @#$ pretty good, I was sold on that alone. Coples may be the name guy, but to me if I get a DE in round 1, I want Curry from Marshall. Jevon Kearse clone. And I mean that in a great way.