- Oct 16, 2006
- 3,486
- 93
I'm going with the AL Central. A bunch of mediocre squads IMO.
Worst Divison in Baseball?
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by wearinthefourfive,
- Start date
- Mar 3, 2007
- 1,536
- 15
AL West son.
- Feb 13, 2010
- 66
- 10
I agree the Royals and the Rangers are keeping that division in the slums.
- Oct 16, 2006
- 3,486
- 93
You know the Rangers are in the West right?
- Oct 20, 2004
- 6,614
- 10
LOL WUT.
- Dec 27, 2002
- 16,335
- 13
The Rangers would push for 100 wins in the Central this year.
- May 4, 2009
- 4,292
- 12
First Divison i thought about was the NL Central .. though i like Pujols and the cardinals ...
- Feb 19, 2006
- 13,661
- 1,087
Usually I bash on the AL West, since the Angels have been the only competitive team during the latter part of the decade. Also the fact that it's the only 4 team division in baseball.
However, the Rangers will finally reap the benefits of their farm system and the Mariners have built a solid squad.
I would go with either Central Division.
However, the Rangers will finally reap the benefits of their farm system and the Mariners have built a solid squad.
I would go with either Central Division.
- Nov 11, 2007
- 18,285
- 26,983
AL Central. When the division champs have 87 wins, that's pretty crappy.
- Oct 28, 2006
- 12,855
- 10,174
- Aug 21, 2005
- 8,139
- 88
AL Central
cedric ceballos 1995 lakers
Banned
- Jul 1, 2009
- 10,833
- 11
al central, al west, nl west, and possibly nl west
- Nov 20, 2003
- 21,365
- 812
No way the AL West should be on this list. Seriously? Angels, Rangers, and M's are all solid squads.
- Jul 15, 2006
- 11,772
- 70
NL Central. AL west is second.
- Sep 12, 2007
- 4,325
- 10
I'm sorry, but the NL West is not the worst division in baseball.
- Nov 18, 2007
- 28,291
- 9,566
And he said it twice.
cedric ceballos 1995 lakers
Banned
- Jul 1, 2009
- 10,833
- 11
i meant to say nl centralOriginally Posted by dland24
And he said it twice.
- Jul 15, 2003
- 1,427
- 10
AL Central hands down. Although I am pretty sure there was a year recently where an NL west team won the division barely breaking .500...
- Jul 15, 2003
- 1,427
- 10
Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
i meant to say nl centralOriginally Posted by dland24
And he said it twice.but anyhow the dodgers decided to be cheap and get worse, the giants didn't do much do improve on the good season they had last year, the rockies stayed the same, the diamondbacks made some decent moves but i don't think their ready to contend and the padres are the padres. if im wrong im wrong i won't make no excuses but i hope im wrong, even though im a mets fan, i wanna go to as many dodger playoff games as i can this season like i've done the past 2 playoffs
So basically in a thread discussing "the" worst division in baseball you decided to name 2/3 of the divisions... So only the East is legit? No bias there I assume
- Nov 18, 2007
- 28,291
- 9,566
Yeah. The Dodgers. In 2008. Barely broke .500......swept the number 1 seed in the divisional series, and lost to the World Series Champions. The NL West has been a staple of the NLCS in recent memory. 4 teams in the last 3 years. Just sayin.....
- Feb 19, 2006
- 13,661
- 1,087
We didn't get any better, but worse?Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
i meant to say nl centralOriginally Posted by dland24
And he said it twice.but anyhow the dodgers decided to be cheap and get worse, the giants didn't do much do improve on the good season they had last year, the rockies stayed the same, the diamondbacks made some decent moves but i don't think their ready to contend and the padres are the padres. if im wrong im wrong i won't make no excuses but i hope im wrong, even though im a mets fan, i wanna go to as many dodger playoff games as i can this season like i've done the past 2 playoffs
cedric ceballos 1995 lakers
Banned
- Jul 1, 2009
- 10,833
- 11
Originally Posted by JONFARR
Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
i meant to say nl centralOriginally Posted by dland24
And he said it twice.but anyhow the dodgers decided to be cheap and get worse, the giants didn't do much do improve on the good season they had last year, the rockies stayed the same, the diamondbacks made some decent moves but i don't think their ready to contend and the padres are the padres. if im wrong im wrong i won't make no excuses but i hope im wrong, even though im a mets fan, i wanna go to as many dodger playoff games as i can this season like i've done the past 2 playoffs
So basically in a thread discussing "the" worst division in baseball you decided to name 2/3 of the divisions... So only the East is legit? No bias there I assume
none really, al east has 3 strong teams and 2 which are a threat to win the world series, nl east has a legit world series team, a team who IF HEALTHY is a legit contender, and solid teams in the braves and marlins. every east team is good or should be good except the blue jays, orioles, and nationals.
nl central has the cardinals, possibly the cubs, maybe the brewers, and crap.
al central has the twins, maybe the tigers and crap
nl west has the dodgers who got worse, the rockies, a slightly above average team in the giants, and crap
al west has the angels who should be good, the mariners who look good on paper, the rangers who should win about 85 games and crap.
maybe if anything, i'd take the al west off that worst divison list but thats about it.
- Feb 17, 2007
- 21,784
- 2,957
Talk bad about the AL West all you want, but all the pitching in that division will eat up the AL Central.
- Sep 12, 2007
- 4,325
- 10
The Dodgers lost in the NLCS so take them out of the equation. The Rockies are a slightly above average team? They won the Wild Card. The Giants aren't too shabby either.Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
Originally Posted by JONFARR
Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
i meant to say nl centralOriginally Posted by dland24
And he said it twice.but anyhow the dodgers decided to be cheap and get worse, the giants didn't do much do improve on the good season they had last year, the rockies stayed the same, the diamondbacks made some decent moves but i don't think their ready to contend and the padres are the padres. if im wrong im wrong i won't make no excuses but i hope im wrong, even though im a mets fan, i wanna go to as many dodger playoff games as i can this season like i've done the past 2 playoffs
So basically in a thread discussing "the" worst division in baseball you decided to name 2/3 of the divisions... So only the East is legit? No bias there I assume
none really, al east has 3 strong teams and 2 which are a threat to win the world series, nl east has a legit world series team, a team who IF HEALTHY is a legit contender, and solid teams in the braves and marlins. every east team is good or should be good except the blue jays, orioles, and nationals.
nl west has the dodgers who got worse, the rockies, a slightly above average team in the giants, and crap
- May 7, 2009
- 2,356
- 12
Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
Originally Posted by JONFARR
Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
i meant to say nl centralOriginally Posted by dland24
And he said it twice.but anyhow the dodgers decided to be cheap and get worse, the giants didn't do much do improve on the good season they had last year, the rockies stayed the same, the diamondbacks made some decent moves but i don't think their ready to contend and the padres are the padres. if im wrong im wrong i won't make no excuses but i hope im wrong, even though im a mets fan, i wanna go to as many dodger playoff games as i can this season like i've done the past 2 playoffs
So basically in a thread discussing "the" worst division in baseball you decided to name 2/3 of the divisions... So only the East is legit? No bias there I assume
none really, al east has 3 strong teams and 2 which are a threat to win the world series, nl east has a legit world series team, a team who IF HEALTHY is a legit contender, and solid teams in the braves and marlins. every east team is good or should be good except the blue jays, orioles, and nationals.
nl central has the cardinals, possibly the cubs, maybe the brewers, and crap.
al central has the twins, maybe the tigers and crap
nl west has the dodgers who got worse, the rockies, a slightly above average team in the giants, and crap
al west has the angels who should be good, the mariners who look good on paper, the rangers who should win about 85 games and crap.
maybe if anything, i'd take the al west off that worst divison list but thats about it.
you mentioned 3 al west teams and say crap after that when there is 4 teams in that division. the a's arent that bad they just got alot of young players and good pitching.
Similar threads
- Poll
