worst quality jordans ever?

wc4s are great. i dont mind the leather. fr4s and mil4s on the other hand are built a bit different.
mean.gif
 
kobe4threebang said:
2006 military 4 instant beater status after 1 wear they where creased like u played ball in them 100x


cdp 4 ive yet to see somebodys who wore them more than 5x w/out midsole cracking and no cushion what so ever


2006 fire red 3's ive yet to see somebodys who wore them more than 5x w/out midsole cracking


2012 fire red 4's probably the worst quality shoe ive ever had the others at least looked fine before i wore them these came pre creased EVERYWHERE mine looked like some one took a lighter to them and tried to melt the leather it was wrinkled so bad




anything else? i cant speak for anything prior to 2006 since i dont own alot before then just some stuff from 99-01
Click to expand...
Lmao

laugh.gif
 
My mil4 retro still in great shape ( knock on wood) worn 7- very minimal creasing and no paint chipping . Use it w/o force shields or gel insole. My fire red and thunder 4 sucks.
 
I'm not really going to debate quality with anyone who views stiff plastic leather as a positive because their shoes don't crease, because we obviously have a different opinion of things that factor into a shoe having good quality. We're on the same page with paint cracking though.

The only V's I've wanted this year were the Scotchlite-tongue Fire Reds from January and the Laney's in November. Did a CP3 to Blake Griffin behind the back pass on the first pair when I felt the terrible "leather" and the seemingly steel-reinforced boot toe area, and the Laney's are looking like they're going to have soft, plush tumbled leather from what I can see so I'm all unless I see otherwise come release.
 
IMO soft leather only belongs on certain shoes 1s,3a,10s & 13s using that same leather on the 4s,5s,6s wouldn't be right
 
How was the quality of the European true blues have a chance to grab a pair at a decent price
 
Gordonson said:
I'm not really going to debate quality with anyone who views stiff plastic leather as a positive because their shoes don't crease, because we obviously have a different opinion of things that factor into a shoe having good quality. We're on the same page with paint cracking though.

The only V's I've wanted this year were the Scotchlite-tongue Fire Reds from January and the Laney's in November. Did a CP3 to Blake Griffin behind the back pass on the first pair when I felt the terrible "leather" and the seemingly steel-reinforced boot toe area, and the Laney's are looking like they're going to have soft, plush tumbled leather from what I can see so I'm all unless I see otherwise come release.
Click to expand...
I like your CP3 pass thing ahahah that was funny
 
You guys thing they create the shoes at different factories tho? It is a possibility that each factory has different branded supplies to create the same shoe
 
SteeloGreen said:
IMO soft leather only belongs on certain shoes 1s,3a,10s & 13s using that same leather on the 4s,5s,6s wouldn't be right
Click to expand...

...What? Every original pair came with soft, thick leather in those same numbers you feel it wouldn't look right on. The Motorsport VI's was the best quality retro we've seen from one of those numbers in the last 4 years, and its leather pretty much creased when you looked at it. But once again, we seem to have differing tastes in what good quality means, so different strokes for different folks.
 
Last edited:
2008 CDP black/red XIs and 2009 Space Jam XIs were straight bausura.

Im glad they got got new molds for 2010+
 
Last edited:
I dont own them, but my homies Black Tongue 5s from this year were the worst quality Jordan I've ever layed eyes on. They were terrible! The leather look literally like plastic, and the 23 was so poorly stitched it was a crime that he payed 185 shipped for them.
 
CDP 11s and Olympic 6s (2012 version) are the two most uncomfortable shoes in my collection. I can't say they're the worst quality ever, as I there are quite a few Jordans I never owned.
 
I knew the 2007 Fire Red III's would make it on here. :lol:
The day I unds'd them the paint chipped on both pairs like they were 10 years old or something.

And I heard all of the stories about the CDP IV's chipping badly too, haha.
 
matters7 said:
Ur tripping on the true blues. The leather is better then the wc88's dude smh
Click to expand...

This^
I picked up a pair of Europe release a few weeks ago one of the best J's I own much better then the us release and those weren't bad... If yours are trash probably fakes... Gm.... Reps
 
matters7 said:
Gordonson said:
Last year's White Cement IV retro was absolutely terrible. Wore them 3 times before sadly finally accepting how bad they were and selling them. Sucks, because that's my 2nd favorite Jordan of all time. The hunt for '99s continues.
Click to expand...
Ya'll must be trippin! No way are they horrible. Fire red 4's are by far the worst retro ive seen, the pleather isnt the same as wc4's at all, its like paper.
Click to expand...
My 4s are great
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom