KanyIZZY
formerly j o 19
- 18,333
- 47,679
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2004
FIRST MILITARY BLUE IV'S FROM LIKE 05 I THINK… THE QUALITY WAS SO TERRIBLE …PROB THE FIRST OF ITS QUALITY DOWN GRADE KIND
worst quality jordans ever?
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by kobe4threebang,
- Start date
- 605
- 163
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2010
without a doubt 06 militaries and CDP XIs... both were SOO trash...
sold both after 1 wear each... and that was before all this retro every other year nonsense.
aqua 8s had turrible paint also but i couldnt even part with em... one of my all time favs
sold both after 1 wear each... and that was before all this retro every other year nonsense.
aqua 8s had turrible paint also but i couldnt even part with em... one of my all time favs
- 605
- 163
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2010
the EUROPEAN release?? son these were amazing retros. like 5x better than the US release that followed a few years after
- 2,748
- 604
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2013
- 20,023
- 10,864
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
- 3,969
- 535
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2001
Xx8 for sure.
The sole design is a total failure with many people experiencing the pop out of the zoom air unit in the forefoot area and rips open the outsole.
The sole design is a total failure with many people experiencing the pop out of the zoom air unit in the forefoot area and rips open the outsole.
- 1,311
- 214
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
everyone shoe that was apart of the countdown packages ..they all felt like wooden chancletas
bigj505
Staff member
- 42,582
- 21,768
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2007
- 96
- 23
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2013
My Bred 4s were tanks, i must've had a really good pair. Fire Red 4s and Chicago 1s were awful though, especially that cardboard tongue on the 1s. And the Black Tongue Fire Red 5s were a complete ATROCITY. Traded them right off the bat after I wore them.
- 12
- 12
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2012
2006 black tongue fire red 5's smh, paint chipping is terrible
2012 bred 4's, maybe its just me but mine creased terribly and the midsole paint job is cheap.. I have 40 pairs of kicks so i must have worn em 4 times
2006 grapes- paint chipping like crazy
2013 shadow 1's, toe box creased so bad after 2 wears
2012 olympic 7s LEATHER IS ****
I was, however, impressed with the olympic 6s when they came out, good job on that one JB
2012 bred 4's, maybe its just me but mine creased terribly and the midsole paint job is cheap.. I have 40 pairs of kicks so i must have worn em 4 times
2006 grapes- paint chipping like crazy
2013 shadow 1's, toe box creased so bad after 2 wears
2012 olympic 7s LEATHER IS ****
I was, however, impressed with the olympic 6s when they came out, good job on that one JB
- 279
- 94
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
Nobody buys Retro J's for quality. They all suck as far as quality. Some are just worse than others
- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
All the shoes with paint chipping
- 15
- 11
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2012
I could go on and on in this thread, its such a shame!
We spend so much money every month for these sneakers, some stand in line for hours or even days to get one and JB is putting the worst materials on these Jordans!
I hope someday they will hear us and step up with the quality!
Cause this is so ridiculous JB!
We spend so much money every month for these sneakers, some stand in line for hours or even days to get one and JB is putting the worst materials on these Jordans!
I hope someday they will hear us and step up with the quality!
Cause this is so ridiculous JB!
- 2,748
- 604
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2013
Better than the 2001 pair too?
In 01 I was in high school and beat them to death pretty quick. They didn't make it back from college so I haven't seen them since 06-07ish. But I do believe so
- 1,938
- 201
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
Shadow was my favorite release of the year
- 1,938
- 201
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
- 5,107
- 377
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
truth.
been wanting them for years. missed the first retro and couldn't land the "for the love of the gaze" for a reasonable price, i even liked the heart logo. then my wife bought these for me to celebrate my university graduation, and the leather was as you said, and they were also a full size too big. i seriously exchanged and went a whole damn size down.
Last edited:
- 8,038
- 5,225
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2006
shadow 1s are nice and btw leather is supposed to crease when it is decent leather so your decision to put up a shoe that has creases as a reason for them to be a bad release means that every release from 01 and back is horrible because the nicer the leather the easier it is to crease, OG 1s crease beautifuly
- 12
- 12
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2012
im not talking about normal creasing bruh, mine creased real bad on 2 spots of the toe box on just one foot.. i have a lot of kicks from the 00-02 era and they creased normal.. the 2013 are not OG's and dont match the quality the OG leather or even my 2001 retro 1's
- 738
- 588
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2012
Really? Quality was better than the last three XI releases. Thicker tongue. Thicker ankle padding. True to size. 23 on back lasts longer. To each his own though...
- 881
- 1,109
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
Pacific 7's are probably the worst i've seen recently
- 457
- 437
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2012
2011 Black Cement 3s were HORRIBLE
CDP Bred 11s also
CDP Bred 11s also
alp
Banned
- 39,966
- 8,990
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
not everything from 2006-2007 was like this, a lot of nice js
- 2,389
- 1,091
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2012
Regarding the eu true blue 3's. I order them from rmkstore. Once I receive them I notice the leather was straight up cardboard like. Super stiff, Horrible smell, height of the shoe was off and the shoes felt like a boot. I sold them and hour after I got them to some store in Jamaica ave for what I paid. I believe I got fakes no im sorry a "100% authentic grey market pair." I learn my lesson that day. If I don't get them on release day I luck out. Flightclub is loaded with grey market pairs becareful.
Last edited:
- 37,721
- 15,382
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2005
This. And the Mars IV's. All I heard were complaints about these.