When the Bulls went 72-10 was that a reflection of the sorry state of affairs in the NBA?
When the Bulls went 72-10 was that a reflection of the sorry state of affairs in the NBA?
Youre comparing HS to Division 1 athletes.
Youre comparing HS to Division 1 athletes.
x2
x2
Biologically, men are more athletically gifted so of course a men's team would beat a women's team, but that doesn't say anything about the state of women's basketball. You're comparing apples to oranges.
Biologically, men are more athletically gifted so of course a men's team would beat a women's team, but that doesn't say anything about the state of women's basketball. You're comparing apples to oranges.
No, I don't think that I am comparing highschool to division 1 athletes, I am just using my personal experience and things I have watched first hand. Basically saying that a girl who is physically advanced and more skilled than other females can dominate a game on BOTH ends. It only takes one girl to dominate a game where in the men's arena, unless you have Kobe talent that is not necessarily going to happen. I mean how many times have you seen a female with UConn women's basketball talent at your local gym (Maya Moore) not often. I bet everyguy on this board can attest that most girls that play with the guys just get in the way 9/10 times. The chances of playing with a Maya Moore or a Candace Parker (talent level wise) in your local gym are few and far in between. But, you always see dudes who can play above the rim at a dime a dozen. So now consequently you have Geno and his staff getting all the girls that have dominated in their respective areas, while other schools are getting girls who have dominated, but not on that Uconn women's type level. So basically the female that I was talking about in my earlier post did not even have a chance of going to UConn, despite playing varsity from the seventh grade on up and being player of the year 9th thru 12th grade. Even with all those accolades the biggest offer she got was from a D-1AA school. She was not what you call "UConn Talent". So that should tell you the talent level of the girls that they have at Uconn, and if he has 12 to 15 of them on his team, and everybody has one or two, that is why I cannot give that streak all that kind of credit.Originally Posted by Durden7
Youre comparing HS to Division 1 athletes.
No, I don't think that I am comparing highschool to division 1 athletes, I am just using my personal experience and things I have watched first hand. Basically saying that a girl who is physically advanced and more skilled than other females can dominate a game on BOTH ends. It only takes one girl to dominate a game where in the men's arena, unless you have Kobe talent that is not necessarily going to happen. I mean how many times have you seen a female with UConn women's basketball talent at your local gym (Maya Moore) not often. I bet everyguy on this board can attest that most girls that play with the guys just get in the way 9/10 times. The chances of playing with a Maya Moore or a Candace Parker (talent level wise) in your local gym are few and far in between. But, you always see dudes who can play above the rim at a dime a dozen. So now consequently you have Geno and his staff getting all the girls that have dominated in their respective areas, while other schools are getting girls who have dominated, but not on that Uconn women's type level. So basically the female that I was talking about in my earlier post did not even have a chance of going to UConn, despite playing varsity from the seventh grade on up and being player of the year 9th thru 12th grade. Even with all those accolades the biggest offer she got was from a D-1AA school. She was not what you call "UConn Talent". So that should tell you the talent level of the girls that they have at Uconn, and if he has 12 to 15 of them on his team, and everybody has one or two, that is why I cannot give that streak all that kind of credit.Originally Posted by Durden7
Youre comparing HS to Division 1 athletes.
