- 8,274
- 2,165
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2001
a must buy, but at $175 Nike starting to sell at reseller prices
Air Jordan XI Retro - White/Concord/Black - CONFIRMED - Holiday 2011
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by blondsoccerplyr,
- Start date
- 575
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2004
^^^ $180
- 148
- 15
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2011
My advice is to start locking down pairs, ASAP. I'm more interested for when these hit the early sellers.
- 10,322
- 2,557
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2010
I wouldnt mind paying 5 dollars more as long as we get better quality.
But damn, they would retail for 125 and they were better before.
But damn, they would retail for 125 and they were better before.
- 1,700
- 498
- Joined
- May 31, 2011
I live in NC....for these you probably wanna camp.
- 944
- 278
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2008
I imagine we should see these around the first week of August. We'll at least by the first week of August.
Yup. I'm still holding onto my 00 retros. $180 is madness, what are they, foamposites?Originally Posted by zapatohead408
I wouldnt mind paying 5 dollars more as long as we get better quality.
But damn, they would retail for 125 and they were better before.
- 1,237
- 50
- Joined
- May 22, 2004
^ I thought the retail for these is $175.00...
Space Jams and Cool Grey XI's Retailed for $175.00 why would it be $180.00 retail for Concord XI's?
Space Jams and Cool Grey XI's Retailed for $175.00 why would it be $180.00 retail for Concord XI's?
Originally Posted by hAzEee aNd sN3aKerS
^ I thought the retail for these is $175.00...
Space Jams and Cool Grey XI's Retailed for $175.00 why would it be $180.00 retail for Concord XI's?
Nike announced price increases for all its kicks later this year. Kicks that were 150 will be 160. The foamposite Max's(tim duncans) will be $225.
- 11,327
- 7,175
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2008
5 dollar increase is ok i guess
- 66,732
- 77,457
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
can't wait to cop a month or two early like the cg's. waiting in line, or waiting period is wack. patience is overrated.
makavelidadawn
Banned
- 222
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2011
cant wait
- 2,748
- 139
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2007
LOL
Martin so crayzay....
Martin so crayzay....
- 4,256
- 13
- Joined
- May 21, 2009
^^^^^That OG Cut>>>>>>>>
- 247
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2005
I need em in my life! I hope I get in that line early enough this time.
- 3,969
- 535
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2001
5 dollars increase, YES.
50 dollars increase, NO!
- 610
- 68
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2011
debating on whether to just cop 2000s again and an OG pair, en route to passing on these. the hype is making me want to stay far away, unless i can be guaranteed a pair without having to be at a mall at 3 in the afternoon the next day. To be honest, the 09' jams sucked, the cool greys were a lil better, im nervous JBs gonna ruin these....
- 40,141
- 11,080
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
- 110
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2011
I'm wondering the same thing. Think it just depends on where you are at in NC
- 2,064
- 509
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2011
Definitely had to camp for the cool-greys in durham at south-point me and my boys got kicked OUT the mall because we were there at 9pm the previous night.
NOTHING ON THIS GREEN EARTH WAS GONNA STOP US FROM GETTING A PAIR and we all wear a different shoe size too
- 10,322
- 2,557
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2010
Originally Posted by cguy610
Originally Posted by hAzEee aNd sN3aKerS
^ I thought the retail for these is $175.00...
Space Jams and Cool Grey XI's Retailed for $175.00 why would it be $180.00 retail for Concord XI's?
Nike announced price increases for all its kicks later this year. Kicks that were 150 will be 160. The foamposite Max's(tim duncans) will be $225.
how about $55 increase?
- 11,327
- 7,175
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2008
- 17,653
- 20,450
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2011
$225 for foams?
Nike is out of their minds.
- 12,848
- 13,997
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2007
Damn I'm callin the hookup for these.. 2 pairs on lock. Will def still be at Arden tho to laugh at all the people running and getting bent over by security.
- 1,310
- 59
- Joined
- May 2, 2011
Originally Posted by memphissfinest
Obviously not true though
