- Jun 22, 2018
- 6,200
- 7,704
Anytime I see someone of that obesity I assume it's a medical condition.
FAT Shaming
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by marikomorose,
- Start date
Anytime I see someone of that obesity I assume it's a medical condition.
- Feb 2, 2025
- 8,635
- 19,425
No medical condition makes you eat at McDonald’s
- Jun 22, 2018
- 6,200
- 7,704
I know fat people but I don't know anyone of that level. I also know 40 year olds with 6 packs that eat McDonald's. Gotta be more to it than that.
- Feb 2, 2025
- 8,635
- 19,425
Genetics will play a part, but calories going in are what they are.
- Apr 16, 2005
- 16,994
- 18,445
Wouldn't it just be mainly a combination of
Not sure how much more complex it is
- genetics
- lifestyle choices (diet and exercise)
- discipline
- medical condition (from my understanding, this is extremely rare but a lot of fatties use this as an excuse)
Not sure how much more complex it is
- Feb 23, 2006
- 6,629
- 4,897
Nah it's just calories in and out.
Medical conditions can play a part in your metabolism, ability to exercise or how your brain's responds to food/hungry. But that just means you need to recalculate your calorie needs based on that.
Medical conditions can play a part in your metabolism, ability to exercise or how your brain's responds to food/hungry. But that just means you need to recalculate your calorie needs based on that.
- Feb 2, 2025
- 8,635
- 19,425
The size comes from somewhere. We can claim whatever we want but why is it that in other countries ain’t no water buffalos prancing around? Went to Australia and did NOT see one girl who couldn’t just throw in a bikini. It was wild.
- Apr 16, 2005
- 16,994
- 18,445
i have been blessed with pretty good genetics and have been active pretty much my entire life but there have been periods of my life when i couldn't exercise or walk much (typically when i was injured so i literally couldn't do anything mobile) & still ate anything i wanted...still ended up with basically no weight gain
- Feb 23, 2006
- 6,629
- 4,897
Right, so you weren't eating in surplus beyond your normal calorie needs to stay around the same weight.
- Apr 16, 2005
- 16,994
- 18,445
how would that neglect genetics? are you literally saying genetics play no part in the amount of one's normal calorie and how your body burn and store calories?
- Feb 23, 2006
- 6,629
- 4,897
It doesn't neglect genetics. Your genetics provide you with an individual rate of burning calories. You're not overweight because your genetics makes you burn less calories, your overweight because you consume a lot more than you burn.
Lets say you can eat an entire pizza, not gain weight and I can't because I have a low metabolism. Instead of sitting there crying about how I can't burn calories as fast as you, while I'm scarfing down a whole pizza, I could just not scarf down a whole pizza. And if I choose to do that, I should choose to workout as well.
- Apr 16, 2005
- 16,994
- 18,445
- Apr 20, 2022
- 2,621
- 5,856
Everybody born different.
- Feb 23, 2006
- 6,629
- 4,897
friscostylez
Did you forget this part?:Calories in-and-out is the deciding factor. How many that needs to be can be impacted by genetics, medications, lifestyle etc. That woman didn't get that size because of genetics and a medical condition. She got that big because she over consumed despite whatever issues she may have had.
- Feb 2, 2025
- 8,635
- 19,425
But everyone can eat the same.
- Apr 20, 2022
- 2,621
- 5,856
One man’s food can be another man’s poison.
- Feb 2, 2025
- 8,635
- 19,425
Don’t let it exceed the calories you burn and you won’t get fat. The end
- Apr 20, 2022
- 2,621
- 5,856
In a perfect world yes, but let’s step into the reality of living in the western world.
- Apr 16, 2005
- 16,994
- 18,445
Calories in-and-out is the deciding factor. How many that needs to be can be impacted by genetics, medications, lifestyle etc. That woman didn't get that size because of genetics and a medical condition. She got that big because she over consumed despite whatever issues she may have had.
You can replace medical condition with genetics and it wouldn't make a difference
- Feb 23, 2006
- 6,629
- 4,897
Correct, because its calories in vs out. Glad it finally clicked for you.
- Apr 16, 2005
- 16,994
- 18,445
not correct because you were wrong when you said "it just calories in and out" and then proceed to tell us there are other factors involved
- Feb 23, 2006
- 6,629
- 4,897
I was right. Its calories in vs calories out. The other stuff doesn't cause you to gain weight. They just impact how you calculate...wait for it...calories in vs out.
Hope that helps.
- Feb 12, 2015
- 1,854
- 1,754
f*** Dave blunts
- Apr 16, 2005
- 16,994
- 18,445
nope, you were wrong and you don't even know what you are arguing about
feel free to go back up and see if you can ffollow along the discussion
- Feb 23, 2006
- 6,629
- 4,897
Sounds like you dont understand calories in-vs-out.
Let me know when you figure that out.
Similar threads
