- 699
- 379
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2012
Facebook Stalk complete. Ex has a kid and it aint mine
- 2,668
- 62
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2006
seeing pics of your girl with another man >: 
- 8,715
- 5,390
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2013
Curious as well.
- 9,025
- 8,118
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2013
This is bad. I'd rather know everything I'm tagged in is private (except to friends) than to be able creep on a few sloots pics. This is not good at all. ****.
Edit: works for me on PC using google chrome, not on iPad.
Edit: works for me on PC using google chrome, not on iPad.
Last edited:
- 21,365
- 812
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2003
Make sure your language in account settings is set to English (US), I ended up using facebook ID number which you can grab from their profile. Paste in and voila
- 1,422
- 548
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2012
I believe this was proven wrong. 4chan posted the way to do it, but there was great debate over the accuracy. I wouldn't sweat it.
- 11,177
- 1,535
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
Facebook Stalk complete. Ex has a kid and it aint mine
- 67,838
- 102,859
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2010
- 66,702
- 77,407
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
ughhh thanks a lot op..i had been doing great not going to her page. fudge!
Ahhh I miss her face..
Ahhh I miss her face..
- 67,838
- 102,859
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2010
ughhh thanks a lot op..i had been doing great not going to her page. fudge!
Ahhh I miss her face..
View media item 512984
- 2,967
- 471
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
OP, If I could hug you in real life, I would.
- 8,142
- 5,318
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
This sounds tempting, but my resolve to stay off FB is greater...
Besides, the past is just that. I have no interest in reliving it and/or seeing what certain people are doing with their lives.
Responses in here are OD funny though, and POST PICS BRUUHHSSSS!!!!!
...
Besides, the past is just that. I have no interest in reliving it and/or seeing what certain people are doing with their lives.
Responses in here are OD funny though, and POST PICS BRUUHHSSSS!!!!!
...
- 8,142
- 5,318
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
Question-
Why do people post or allow themselves to be tagged in unflattering pics only to set said pics on private?
If you're that embarrassed by the pics, why even post them or allow yourself to be tagged in them?
Where's the logic?
...
Why do people post or allow themselves to be tagged in unflattering pics only to set said pics on private?
If you're that embarrassed by the pics, why even post them or allow yourself to be tagged in them?
Where's the logic?
...
Last edited:
- 5,584
- 974
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2010
maybe because people don't post the pictures themselves
and untagging + hiding from newsfeed is the most you could do, but they could still be found
and also, it's really hard to untag yourself when people post 500 pictures from every weekend :x
do u even fb?
Last edited:
- 2,967
- 471
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
maybe because people don't post the pictures themselves
and untagging + hiding from newsfeed is the most you could do, but they could still be found
and also, it's really hard to untag yourself when people post 500 pictures from every weekend
do u even fb?
- 39,320
- 19,718
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
Meh, nowadays this would be cool on Instagram, Facebook is not eeem relevant anymore..
- 24,036
- 1,926
- Joined
- May 18, 2005
cute comment, you must not understand how these sites are different...
you can't have "hidden" pictures on instagram, either it's a hidden account or public. on fb, you can have hidden folders, hidden friends, hidden likes, and this will expose everything you've tried to hide.
I've seen females with "hidden" folders of nudes, but the rest of their fb is for their family/work. now they're exposed.
This trick didn't work for 1 person I know since she's on OD security, you can't even search her on fb :x, I think you need to be an email contact or something.
- 5,544
- 655
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2009
Creeped on this one chick I met a few months back. 
Worried that down the line this will show up on my news feed of some sort.
Worried that down the line this will show up on my news feed of some sort.
- 8,142
- 5,318
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
maybe because people don't post the pictures themselves
and untagging + hiding from newsfeed is the most you could do, but they could still be found
and also, it's really hard to untag yourself when people post 500 pictures from every weekend :x
do u even fb?
1. Spare me the e-histrionics...
.2. I was more than likely "fb" before you, which is to say that I was actively on FB during simpler times, well before the platform became complicated and overly intrusive. Certainly before it became a verb.
3. Like I said, FB was a much more sincere platform when I was heavy into it. Back then, untagging yourself from a pic was enough to shield you. And private pics remained just that, private. But obviously, times have changed. Feels weird to be an "old-timer" when I'm only in my twenties...
. Ohh well, you reap what you sow....
Last edited:
- 7,244
- 5,436
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2012
if only people still posted pics on fb
- 7,244
- 5,436
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2012
- 519
- 219
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
Ya'll arguing about triple OG status on NT is one thing, but for something like Facebook.. just lame.
- 34,392
- 27,552
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2002
