- 11,974
- 3,257
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
Wow the court didn’t destroy the ACA.
I wonder if this will alter the rhetoric surrounding SCOTUS appointments moving forward.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Wow the court didn’t destroy the ACA.
I wonder how many pedos you’ve supportedI wonder if this will alter the rhetoric surrounding SCOTUS appointments moving forward.
How the **** are the Dems suppose to even calibrate it when Manchin doesn't tell them his problem with the bill? You want to be a right-leaning centrist, fine, you want protect you brand, fine. But Manchin takes his nonsense beyond the point of what is reasonable caucus politics.be honest, do you really think this HR1 thing has been well calibrated to get Joe Manchins vote?
Miss me with this snark.Joe Manchin is very very wrong about this whole filibuster thing,
he could switch parties tomorrow and be republican senator for life in west virginia if that's what you'd all prefer.
so whatever his level of racism is, it's clearly it's not so high that you can't persuade him.
otherwise he'd just become a republican.
Don't worry they will do something disgusting to hurt regular peopleI wonder if this will alter the rhetoric surrounding SCOTUS appointments moving forward.
But 100 years later, the Negro still is not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and finds himself in exile in his own land
I wonder how many pedos you’ve supported
Seems like since the decision was based on the plaintiff not being able to prove they suffered and damages from the mandate being zeroed out, it was an easy decision to makeWhoa, Cavanaugh and Barret voted for the ACA. Weren't they put in to vote against it lol
This is shoddy lawyering (at best) on your behalf. They struck it down on standing and punted making an actual decision on whether it could stand without the individual mandate. You’re either trolling, not attempting to make any good analysis, or just being yourself which is usually all of the above.I wonder if this will alter the rhetoric surrounding SCOTUS appointments moving forward.
And like clockwork, YOUR people. Dog whistling.