Pics of the 2's

gabegrams · Oct 7, 2003

Oh ish.

The white ones are copped, but I'm not feeling the black ones.
GaBe GRaM$
TeaM BLoCk HuGGa$
http://pub175.ezboard.com/fniketalkfrm12.showMessage?topicID=8128.topic

cldriver · Oct 7, 2003

if you are fortunate enough to own a pair of the og are retro 2's. you will notice a huge difference between what you see in the pic from the og and 94 retro. I was thinking bout selling mine 2's (94) but might have a second opinion. What size are those in the pic. if kids then i might be able to see why the big difference.................................. upset and mad at the 2004 retro >:

If Michael Jordan was to sign with ADIADAS back in 1984. Would ADIDAS currently have the sneaker game on lock?? Something I ask myself eve

daz from tha pound · Oct 7, 2003

Those black II's look just like the nu retros. I like the II's. I'm copping for the nostaglia (sp?), not because they look so good. They are overrated imo...nice, but not great.
chuuch!

[/b]
U Know What I'm Throwin' Up

poofyo101 · Oct 7, 2003

GONNA GO CAMP OUT AT THE MALL NOW for those iis. i like em alot

teddythegr81 · Oct 7, 2003

theyd probly have the wings box since it uses the logo too.

[/b]

woodside718 · Oct 7, 2003

wow

both are copped anyone know the retail price?

jordanh109 · Oct 7, 2003

I'm glad i dont' have to spend a bunch on retro 94's!!!

copped!!!!2 tops!

unregistered(d) · Oct 7, 2003

I like them. :smokin

PURPLE PEOPLE EATER

blazers21ntnp · Oct 7, 2003

Thanks for the picture!

[/b]

nyc pointz · Oct 7, 2003

cot damn
DONT STEAL MY AVATAR :\

dayz23 · Oct 7, 2003

SOME1 PLEASE SEND ME PICD >:

they arent showing nemore

airphilippines · Oct 7, 2003

THOSE AR SICK AS HELL :wow:

ATTACK OF THE KILLER MEATLOAF THING

airjordankickz · Oct 7, 2003

I have a question. Are those yours???? If so how did you get them, if you dont mind asking.

retroRoc. · Oct 7, 2003

Wow those are sick!!!!!!!!!! I was wondering if it says nike on the back?

650boyz · Oct 7, 2003

Quote:
was wondering if it says nike on the back?

judging from the black IIs it looks like it...cant really tell but i think it says nike

[/b]

jumpmanxv1 · Oct 7, 2003

They look good, but nothing like OG or 94 IIs, the 04 retros look EXTREMELY fat, especially the midsole. Am I the only one who sees this ??? Regardless, I'll still probably wind up buying them.

biglfanatic · Oct 7, 2003

OMFG!!! THOSE ARE AMAZING!!! Thanks for the pictures man!
1
TEAM HARLEM

blco02 · Oct 7, 2003

Yes, it says Nike on the back, but it says "Jordan" on the sole...

IMO, the "Jordan" on the bottom is acceptible as long as the "Nike" remains on the back...

slam ed · Oct 7, 2003

The black/chrome ones seriously make me want to shoot myself in the face. The white ones are better, but not by much.

I'll be buying more '94s.

pinoyjordan23 · Oct 7, 2003

lol u r really bringing the heat!!!! thanks for sharing

the black ones will grow on me, but im in love with the white/red
The "K"rew

crusher914 · Oct 7, 2003

Whites are :wow:

3 pairs for me

create24chaos · Oct 7, 2003

I dont care what nyone says...they both are hot....thank you for the pix....for real....I'm not a fan of blk shoes....but COT DAMN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....these have a few things I always look for in a shoe......!. A dark liner on the inside of the ankle, 2. and a dark midsole.......keeps the dirt from being noticable :wow: