Proposition Joe
formerly rollinwithangel
- 10,215
- 8,048
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
Rogue One and Solo don't get enough credit for being solid or decent movies despite both taking place in an unoriginal setting (Empire, Death Star) or using an already-dead, played-out character (Han Solo). I actually rank both of those over several of the numbered installments.
I was talking to my friend a while back and he introduced me to the revelation that the majority of the main Star Wars movies are not good.
It's a powerful brand whose only objectively fantastic entries are the first three installments (Original Trilogy).
After those, you have arguably two that lie between good-not-perfect and just okay depending on who you ask (TFA, and ROTS to some).
The rest sit somewhere between mediocre and offensively terrible movies (TPM, AOTC, TLJ, ROTS - which is really only looked at as "good by comparison" btw).
It's the only film franchise I can think of where the ancillary material is typically better than the majority of the movies. It's like if someone told me to ignore the Mission Impossible movies and go purchase the official licensed coloring books because they're better.
It's just an old, powerful brand that baby boomers couldn't let go of, and forced us, the subsequent generations, to inherit and deal with.
STAR WARS IS THE CLIMATE CHANGE OF MOVIES.
IDK man I think Rogue one gets a lot of credit. It’s the only new SW movie that’s universally loved.