Belgium
formerly colombia
- 26,186
- 37,484
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
I personally don't participate in the whole Trump is a racist debate. I think it's a fair assumption that he is based on events in the past but ultimately he hasn't said anything 100% racist that I'm aware of so it's more of an assumption than a clear fact in my opinion. Instead I use the term bigot, because that fact is irrefutable and there is countless evidence to support that fact.
Always funny how ignorant Trump haters never give concrete examples of Trump's "racism" or "sexism". They just like to hate something and it's truly sad.
The whole Trump is a racist debate always ends up the same. Anti-Trump posters provide evidence that leads them to the assumption he is a racist, the Trump supporters downplay the evidence and don't think there's sufficient evidence to make the claim he is racist. And then everyone argues in circles.
Which is why it's better to just leave it at Trump being a bigot. No reasonable person can refute that and it's not much better than being a racist anyway. And like a racist, a bigot shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a political power position, certainly not the white house.
Last edited: