- 558
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2009
im thinkin i shoudla got these instead of the copper....
o well. might spot somethin at sneaker friends
o well. might spot somethin at sneaker friends
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by disbyaboiij
obviously '10s
it's not just the shade of purple that is different,the '10 foams feel rough to the touch.not the same smooth texture from other foams.the icier sole is more of a curse than a blessing when you get down to it.Originally Posted by lildawgryan
Originally Posted by AB Doom
2009's looking better in those pics from JoJo!
I dont see how the small change in the shade of purple makes or breaks the shoes. The 2010s were the first pair ive seen in person and couldnt ask for anything better. These were released a year ago. I dont see why anyone with the 09's would want the same exact shoe. Theres nothing wrong with the small changes to me.
Originally Posted by CrAzYFLiPxNyC
ISS talking about HOH exclusive Metallic Red Foamposites in May
Originally Posted by CrAzYFLiPxNyC
ISS talking about HOH exclusive Metallic Red Foamposites in May
That's just you. My pair is flawlessOriginally Posted by Sourkush
did anyone have a problem with the quality? i had to go to three different store's just to find a clean pair. They all had glue stains on the collar and heavy dust spot's , this is the worst quality i have seen yet from nike horrible
word.....foamposites are usually fine out da gate...some over a tad overglue..nuffn a blade couldn't cut off you if u really cared.Originally Posted by Regal Black
That's just you. My pair is flawlessOriginally Posted by Sourkush
did anyone have a problem with the quality? i had to go to three different store's just to find a clean pair. They all had glue stains on the collar and heavy dust spot's , this is the worst quality i have seen yet from nike horrible
you should'nt have to do that on a brand new $200 shoe, thats just nike's poor quality control SHAME ON NIKE!!!Originally Posted by ninjahood
word.....foamposites are usually fine out da gate...some over a tad overglue..nuffn a blade couldn't cut off you if u really cared.Originally Posted by Regal Black
That's just you. My pair is flawlessOriginally Posted by Sourkush
did anyone have a problem with the quality? i had to go to three different store's just to find a clean pair. They all had glue stains on the collar and heavy dust spot's , this is the worst quality i have seen yet from nike horrible
THEY GONNA RIDE THIS WAVE 4 AS LONG AS THEY CAN, CANT REALLY BLAME EM THOOriginally Posted by balloonoboy
Damn I wonder how long Nike is going to keep us on this foam high.
Seems like once one color is released, another is announced shortly thereafter.
Not that it's a bad thing...
THEY GONNA RIDE THIS WAVE 4 AS LONG AS THEY CAN, CANT REALLY BLAME EM THOOriginally Posted by balloonoboy
Damn I wonder how long Nike is going to keep us on this foam high.
Seems like once one color is released, another is announced shortly thereafter.
Not that it's a bad thing...
To me the lighter the grooves the cheaper they look. it is as if nike didn't take as much time on these.Originally Posted by Gags1587
2010's>2009's. I have 3 pair of Eggplants (1 2009, 2 from 2010), and the 2010 soles are so much icier (which is why I got 2 pairs).
I also don't really see why microscoping the level of indentation on the foam portion is a deciding factor for which year's release looks better? It's an INDENTATION.
Maybe I'm way out of left field here...
Just my 2 cents.