- 2,220
- 402
- Joined
- May 1, 2005
Sure; right after you start posting something meaningful.Originally Posted by Patrick Bateman
Considering this is High School, I take that back the 6'0 range.. But he's definitely 5'10/11 and looks like probably plays ball.. I don't think can be denied. Instead of telling me to head to Michaels, come back with something more meaningful.Originally Posted by NYC game
Really dudeOriginally Posted by Patrick Bateman
This video is what is going to be discussed because it's clear in front of us. On average, a woman isn't taller than a man. And of course men generally have more muscle tissue mass than woman. This kid is athletically built. And must be 5'11 or in the 6'0 range.. He could've easily handled the situation in a better fashion and end up as the "cool" dude who played it off.. Now he's going to be the villain, the failure, the dude who beats women... stupid kid
Why is he even squaring up?
I think you need to stop typing like "right now", head over to Michael's get you some measuring tape, then head to barnes and noble and hit up the magazine section to see what athletic build looks like.
(Athletic build, 6'"0)