- 1,981
- 163
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
Originally Posted by JsindaA
You can't read to well I see. A better skill set AND rings. In a nut shell what you are saying is "Yea person A is better at the craft and he achieves the objective more than person B ever has....but person B is better" That's the most ******ed logic ever.Originally Posted by Dade B0Y
So I suppose you believe Robert Horry is better than Charles Barkley?Originally Posted by JsindaA
Did this fool say the only argument Kobe stans have is a better skill set and rings? Ummm DUH those are pretty good stances to have to determine a better player. I think Bron is the best but that's one of the dumbest things I've ever seen.
But about 'skill'.
People consistently make the mistake of correlating scoring ability or how one scores with all that there is to being 'skilled'. There are much more facets of the game then how one goes about scoring the basketball.
And even with that. Lebron scored 29 on 50% shooting last year. That makes him a 'great scorer'. A fantastic scorer. Doesn't matter that he doesn't one, two dribble pullup left shoulder like Kobe. He gets buckets. And he gets them at a astoundingly efficient rate. Lebron can also engage an offense from a playmaking standpoint, that is matched by probaly no wing player today. He has point guard level court vision. That's why he's been able to enhance an average at best supporting cast to back to back 60 wins season.
So who really is the more 'skilled', player?