- 25,580
- 18,467
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2003
i would go with FB
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
How do startups make money? They're usually funded by some big wig, right? What are they looking to profit from with that investment? Explain to me how this works because it seems like a Monopoly money to me.
There's not 1 answer because all startups are different . Some founders are looking to continue growing it while some have an exit strategy hoping it'll be acquired.How do startups make money? They're usually funded by some big wig, right? What are they looking to profit from with that investment? Explain to me how this works because it seems like a Monopoly money to me.
The layoff was a big question for me. The department I'm working in wasn't impacted, it was mainly in engineering. I was more concerned about morale in my group. In terms of the layoffs itself, I saw it as a positive as an outsider looking in, TWTR is struggling to find itself and it's operating expenses were bloated, they need to make bold decisions to turn things around.
Twitter just laid off 8% of its company. If you were to go with Twitter make sure you save up an emergency fund asap.
IMO that is the only downfall when comparing the two Twitter comes out on top.
You will save so my money by walking to work. have a bigger footprint at the company, and possibly less competitive. From what you have said Twitter seems like the better choice for you. I wouldn't recommend staying at Twitter longterm.
I think my career perspective is working to live, not living to work. I spent years of my life grinding it out and having my life revolve around work, and I value those years, and I respect people who grind, but right now, at my age, looking for more balance. With that being said, I LOVE living in SF. FB is in Menlo Park, close to Stanford/Palo Alto. I spent years living in the south bay, and it's a different lifestyle. I'm enjoying myself in SF and not willing to move back down south in the peninsula.If it's feasible, I would find a way to move closer to FB HQ, and work for them.
A short commute has tons of value. If you stay in your current location, Twitter is the choice.
You can always land another job if another round of layoffs happen, you'll never get the wasted time on a commute. Never.
I've never lived more than 30 minutes from my job, with traffic. Anything more than that, sounds dreadful.
Very good point about the culture being impacted by paranoia. Didn't think of that.I'd imagine the work culture at Twitter isn't as simplistic as you think. Out of those two options, Twitter doesn't seem to be the pick that will be around for a great deal longer. I'd imagine that causes employees to be very cutthroat, as they are worrying about their own positions, and ensuring their options elsewhere. I could be completely wrong, though.
Sidebar: I just watched that SF2.0 HBO special and apparently your kind is destroying their town; they don't want you there.
I'm black if that matters.
This would potentially be a great outcome a couple years from nowYou know what, if you get stock options, I'd consider Twitter. They're getting taken over one day and it might work out well enough for you if you can cash in on that before you get laid off.
What in the world does this have to do with this thread?Y'all cats don't even know.
You don't NEED facebook and Twitter to survive in this world.
Some of Y'all are a slave to technology.
5 years is very long term in this tech field in this town. Most people stay 1-2 years at a company and move to the next one.
5 years is pretty long even for finance. I know what you mean though. I have more confidence in FB in the long term for sure. In terms of the near term, in finance, Twitter and FB are pretty much the same kind of experience. A bigger issue would be if I was considering to go to a company in a completely different industry, outside of tech, like working for Gap Finance or something. From a market perspective, if I'm looking at candidates in finance, similar experience in Twitter and/or FB would be the same to me. Engineering? Definitely different. But on a back end, finace/accounting type role, very similar. To your point though, more confidence in outlook beyond 2 or 3 years @ FB.Those tend to be developers/engineers and they tend to hop around to smaller start ups and get higher positions or start their own company. OP is in Finance so that would not be beneficial to him. I think 5 yrs of good experience with the FB brand could land him in a higher position with more money at another company/smaller company just with having FB on his resume would make him attractive to recruiters elsewhere.
5 years is pretty long even for finance. I know what you mean though. I have more confidence in FB in the long term for sure. In terms of the near term, in finance, Twitter and FB are pretty much the same kind of experience. A bigger issue would be if I was considering to go to a company in a completely different industry, outside of tech, like working for Gap Finance or something. From a market perspective, if I'm looking at candidates in finance, similar experience in Twitter and/or FB would be the same to me. Engineering? Definitely different. But on a back end, finace/accounting type role, very similar. To your point though, more confidence in outlook beyond 2 or 3 years @ FB.
FB has buses from SF to Menlo Park. It'll take around 1 hour to 1 hour and 15 minutes each way, so about 2 hours round trip.It's going to take you 1.5 hours to get from sf to menlo park?
FB has buses from SF to Menlo Park. It'll take around 1 hour to 1 hour and 15 minutes each way, so about 2 hours round trip.It's going to take you 1.5 hours to get from sf to menlo park?
That's not bad since you aren't using your car. Have you looked up glassdoor reviews of each company for finance positions?
FB has buses from SF to Menlo Park. It'll take around 1 hour to 1 hour and 15 minutes each way, so about 2 hours round trip.
Not sure if serious...Id do neither long term, FB seems to be stronger for the now though,but neither are going to be stable long term as they have a hard time trying to figure out how to monetize their business model.
Id do facebook for 5 yrs then bounce to something more stable in a higher position.