- 24,441
- 22,115
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2015
From a mini lookbook I was working on. These are BIG sleepers (imo), which I appreciate. No hype + retail = win.
When we start rockin pajama pants out in the woods?
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Spectacular23,
- Start date
When we start rockin pajama pants out in the woods?
- 14,384
- 19,400
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
good to know!
Ingenious Bastard
formerly ingenious nick
- 4,283
- 4,709
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2013
Hypebeast hunting gear
- 5,317
- 12,634
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2015
What y’all out hunting?
- 4,036
- 6,238
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
Hype-Beasts
- 84,439
- 111,045
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2012
Stop with the mock ups. Doesn’t make any sense to do that.
They actually get them right or get pretty close sometimes so i say it does
It at least gives us something to talk about and hope for lol
- 6,760
- 1,470
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2004
Are these all the original Is that released for retail?#29 on the list. Been waiting for this for a long time, but if it’s not leather, I’m out
- 2,038
- 3,387
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2004
- 4,727
- 6,567
- Joined
- May 30, 2003
^that is correct
sneakaprince
Supporter
- 16,201
- 19,435
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2007
I wear my 2013s way more than my 2016s.
The reds are different and the so is the cut/ shape of the shoe. 2016 wins I'm terms of shape but 2013 wins in color.
Both are great pick ups, I prefer my 2013s only because they have become a beater of sorts and I truly appreciate the age on my pair.
Pic from last week. I've probably worn this shoe at least 3x since this pic lol.
Just realized this is the same pair in my avy as well.
- 4,727
- 6,567
- Joined
- May 30, 2003
i think everyone should have a pair of breds, no matter what the year...as long as they're not those terrible mids that just came out
i say grab those 2013s....sure the 2016s have a better shape and tumbled red leather (if you even prefer that) but man, they glitter like no other
- 5,241
- 6,936
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2016
Quality is terrible but color way I’d fire. I buy mids for the color way not Quality. Happy I have them
- 4,727
- 6,567
- Joined
- May 30, 2003
lol right on cue
mids thread
mids thread
- 5,241
- 6,936
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2016
- 10,376
- 8,832
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2014
Bruh I'm not cool with the new nike boxes smfh. That open bottom is way too flimsy. I just pulled out my shoe box from the bottom without ripping anything. Nike tryna cut corners on tape foh.
lilbrad407
Supporter
- 1,882
- 9,343
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2014
I too prefer 2013s over 2016s. The color pops a little more and the height difference isn’t that substantial imo.
- 21,115
- 65,560
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2001
Those mids hurt my eyes
- 59
- 93
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2020
What kind of mids are these? I have the 2001 mid version and the wings logo is a jewel like your 2020 high top.Pretty pleased with the 2020 version only thing I’m disappointed about is the wings l
should have been these instead
- 23,469
- 30,406
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
those are the high tops from 2001 (underneath the 2020 highs) with the regular wings logo, the ones you have is the 2001 mids with the jeweled wings logo which 2020 followed.
- 14,384
- 19,400
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
i believe the highs were the Japan exclusives while the mids were what dropped stateside
- 14,038
- 14,202
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2007
2013 breds and royals >> 2016/2017 imo
Last edited:
- 5,504
- 13,457
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2017
Shoe Palace is making phone calls for Mochas in SoCal right now!
Just got the W from Northridge. Friend just won at Inglewood.
Just got the W from Northridge. Friend just won at Inglewood.
- 59
- 93
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2020
I thought those mids where supposed to have a jewel Jordan logo and also number inside the tongue?
- 14,384
- 19,400
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
the mids did have the jewel logo and we’re numbered. The highs came with the silver case, standard Jordan logo, and were numbered I believe.
2001 had 2 different versions of the shoe.
